Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Fortnite Take The L
Screenshot: PC Invasion

Fortnite’s futile ban on confrontational emotes will encourage creative toxicity

It may not be an outright ban, but it has the same effect.

Epic Games have allowed players to decide whether they see confrontational emotes in-game, something that has upset a lot the Fortnite community. Although this isn’t exactly a ban, those upset by it will treat it like such.

Recommended Videos

Toxic gamers will go back to their roots in Fortnite

The idea to allow players to decide whether they want to see confrontational emotes was no doubt implemented to curb the rage players feel when certain emotes are performed after getting defeated.

Granted, there is something uniquely infuriating upon seeing someone flaunt their success whilst you’re forced to watch them after being defeated. This, however, isn’t something exclusive to Fortnite.

Fortnite Confrontational Emotes
Image: Epic Games

Before the days of Battle Royale and emoting, players “trolled” ones they defeated through the iconic and precious art of “teabagging.” An exercise that’s been practiced throughout the ages. Simply crouching and uncrouching in rapid succession was the only way to dunk on your opponents after defeating them.

So with players being able to stop seeing these confrontational emotes, players will resort to the ol’ reliable. Teabagging.

Fortnite hasn’t banned confrontational emotes, but toxic players will still accomodate

Although it may seem logical and harmless to allow players to restrict confrontational emotes whilst still allowing players to use them, the toxic players Epic is trying to protect the community from will treat it like a ban.

The whole point of using confrontational emotes is to enrage – and now they know that lots of players won’t be able to see them using certain emotes, they’ll have to adapt. There’s no fun using “Take the L” if there’s a good chance their opponents can’t see it.

Especially as the confrontational emote visibility is restricted by default, meaning many won’t realise it’s on, or won’t care to change it.

So despite this not being a ban, the good chances of no one bearing witness to their trolling will cause them to use other means, like teabagging, to troll their opponents, effectively making it a ban.

If you think you’re safe from confrontational expressions, just wait until teabagging comes back in style. An art that was lost for a time, now revitalised.

Sure, teabagging isn’t as rage-inducing as the more flavorful Fortnite emotes, but the intention is the same.

In all seriousness, although this ban doesn’t stop toxic players from annoying other players, it will prevent more malicious players from using very certain emotes to harass select portions of the player base. So for that, I do appreciate the steps taken by Epic.

There is more to Fortnite than dunking on your foes, however, such as grabbing that Appa glider before it’s too late.


PC Invasion is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Aidan Lambourne
Aidan Lambourne
Aidan Lambourne is a contributing writer for PC Invasion, with almost a couple years of experience in the industry. He has written about Roblox extensively, although has keenly covered new releases and indie games. A passionate writer and gamer, he still can't really believe he gets to indulge in both for a career.